<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mozilla Thunderbird vs. Google Reader for Feed Reading	</title>
	<atom:link href="/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/</link>
	<description>David Szpunar: Owner, Servant 42 and Servant Voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: information technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pew Internet: Sorting out information technology users		</title>
		<link>/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[information technology &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pew Internet: Sorting out information technology users]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infotech.davidszpunar.com/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/#comment-158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Thanks Ian! Unless my models numbers are mixed up, you have a Windows-based Treo, correct? Mine is Palm-based (the 650 didn t have a Windows version), so your browsing experience could be very different with Pocket IE. &#8230; &#8230;more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Thanks Ian! Unless my models numbers are mixed up, you have a Windows-based Treo, correct? Mine is Palm-based (the 650 didn t have a Windows version), so your browsing experience could be very different with Pocket IE. &#8230; &#8230;more [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Szpunar		</title>
		<link>/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Szpunar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infotech.davidszpunar.com/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/#comment-156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Ian!  Unless my models numbers are mixed up, you have a Windows-based Treo, correct?  Mine is Palm-based (the 650 didn&#039;t have a Windows version), so your browsing experience could be very different with Pocket IE.  Possibly better, even.  And faster, if you have a faster cell data network (mine is Cingular, which is reasonably slow even with EDGE).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ian!  Unless my models numbers are mixed up, you have a Windows-based Treo, correct?  Mine is Palm-based (the 650 didn&#8217;t have a Windows version), so your browsing experience could be very different with Pocket IE.  Possibly better, even.  And faster, if you have a faster cell data network (mine is Cingular, which is reasonably slow even with EDGE).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Grist		</title>
		<link>/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Grist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infotech.davidszpunar.com/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/#comment-155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good to hear that GReader works well on your Treo.  I haven&#039;t used it much on mine (700wx) but I&#039;m going to try it again.

Great Blog!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear that GReader works well on your Treo.  I haven&#8217;t used it much on mine (700wx) but I&#8217;m going to try it again.</p>
<p>Great Blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: shellie		</title>
		<link>/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shellie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infotech.davidszpunar.com/2007/06/04/mozilla-thunderbird-vs-google-reader-for-feed-reading/#comment-152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great breakdown.  I have grown to appreciate Google reader since I can access it anywhere.  I used to much prefer a client because of offline viewing.  I&#039;m with you, it&#039;s time to play with Gears.  The full HTML viewing with comments though... wow... that makes Thunderbird look really appealing. 

Another tool that has helped me with &#039;going back later&#039; and following comments on interesting posts is Google notebook.  I tried co-comment, but it ultimately wasn&#039;t good enough for my work flow.

I have this weird obsession with reading feeds.  I can&#039;t just skim them looking for something interesting (I&#039;m guessing that is what people do), but I must sort, read, or mark all as read.  Google reader makes this easy from anywhere I have internet access and a few mintes.

With 60+ feeds and over 200+ posts a day, it&#039;s a big task to keep it all organized.  Google reader lacks a few things I really want (comments and full text posts) but otherwise it has fit the bill best combined with Google notebook.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great breakdown.  I have grown to appreciate Google reader since I can access it anywhere.  I used to much prefer a client because of offline viewing.  I&#8217;m with you, it&#8217;s time to play with Gears.  The full <span class="ubernym uttInitialism" onmouseover="domTT_activate(this, event, 'content', 'Link to the spec: (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;)','caption', 'HyperText Markup Language' );"><acronym class="uttInitialism">HTML</acronym></span> viewing with comments though&#8230; wow&#8230; that makes Thunderbird look really appealing. </p>
<p>Another tool that has helped me with &#8216;going back later&#8217; and following comments on interesting posts is Google notebook.  I tried co-comment, but it ultimately wasn&#8217;t good enough for my work flow.</p>
<p>I have this weird obsession with reading feeds.  I can&#8217;t just skim them looking for something interesting (I&#8217;m guessing that is what people do), but I must sort, read, or mark all as read.  Google reader makes this easy from anywhere I have internet access and a few mintes.</p>
<p>With 60+ feeds and over 200+ posts a day, it&#8217;s a big task to keep it all organized.  Google reader lacks a few things I really want (comments and full text posts) but otherwise it has fit the bill best combined with Google notebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
